Harvard now losing first place at Cambridge University in the ranking of the top institutions in the world for the first time in seven-year history that a list of universities of the Ivy League was hit first.
Table is based on QS measures the quality of research, graduate employment, education, and as international faculty and student organizations have.
Harvard was still the most popular among those surveyed 5000 employers around the world, but Cambridge was recognized as the best for quality research in a survey of 15 000 scientists and took first place overall. The rankings also use the number of links from a database of academic publications. Top universities graphic top universities in the world - and how their rating changed http://world-college-education.blogspot.com/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/maps_and_graphs/2010/9/7/1283876186403/Top-universities-graphic-001.jpg
Times Higher Education magazine, which publishes its world ranking of universities in the next week, no longer cooperates with QS.Zhurnal concerned that the ratings rely too heavily on subjective research scientists and employers, and not enough on hard indicators kachestva.Novy rating as expected to contain disappointing news for some prestigious British institutions.
Table is based on QS measures the quality of research, graduate employment, education, and as international faculty and student organizations have.
Harvard was still the most popular among those surveyed 5000 employers around the world, but Cambridge was recognized as the best for quality research in a survey of 15 000 scientists and took first place overall. The rankings also use the number of links from a database of academic publications. Top universities graphic top universities in the world - and how their rating changed http://world-college-education.blogspot.com/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/maps_and_graphs/2010/9/7/1283876186403/Top-universities-graphic-001.jpg
Times Higher Education magazine, which publishes its world ranking of universities in the next week, no longer cooperates with QS.Zhurnal concerned that the ratings rely too heavily on subjective research scientists and employers, and not enough on hard indicators kachestva.Novy rating as expected to contain disappointing news for some prestigious British institutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment